Nella celeberrima canzone degli Eagles datata 1977, il protagonista viaggia lungo una strada nel deserto, quando data la stanchezza decide di fermarsi per la notte nell'hotel che da il nome alla canzone, un luogo all'apparenza accogliente ma molto particolare, explain how shortly after the goalkeeper, a place where "You can check out Any time you like But you can never leave" .... Scary .... and so the Social Services when it comes into your life, even after he finished his course, does not go away, because the signs are leaving forever ..... The Social Services is recognized in Italy by Law 84, 23:03 .1993 which establishes the Order. The AS may conduct its activities both privately and as an employee of the public service, in both cases in addition to specific training consists of a bachelor's and / or second level, you must subscribe to the Order: 's Association of Social Workers distinguishes two books per ogni regione: Albo A per i possessori di laurea di secondo livello ed Albo B per i possesori di laurea di primo livello. L'Ordine degli Assistenti Sociali è strutturato per regioni ed è sottoposto all'Ordine Nazionale. In Italia nel 2000 si contavano circa 28.866 iscritti all'ordine il 5% dei quali (1.900 unità ca.) in Emilia Romagna, nel 2008 il totale è passato a 35.754 unità (+ 23%) il 5% dei quali, sempre in Emilia Romagna (1.900 unità ca.) - fonte Ordine Nazionale Assistenti Sociali www.cnoas.it -.
In materia di Tutela Minori, il Servizio Sociale interviene direttamente quando richiesto da un famigliare, dalle istiuzioni scolastiche o su richiesta dell'autorità giudiziaria. Il grado di incisività di questo intervento varia a seconda dei casi, dal monitoraggio, all'allontanamento del o dei minori dal luogo di residenza che dovrebbe limitarsi a casi di "estrema gravità e pregiudizio" ed ove non sia possibile collocare i minori presso parenti. Pare che ad oggi in Italia ci siano 32.000 minori in condizione "di estrema gravità e pregiduzio": 32.000 minori allontanati dalle famiglie e collocati presso strutture eterofamigliari con un costo annuo di circa € 72.000,00 a bambino per un totale di € 2.304.000.000,00 ( tanto per dare una dimensione a questa cifra possiamo dire che Il PIL del Togo del 2008 era di € 2.369.800.000,00 ) - fonte Panorama 17.11.2009 - Sequestri di Stato -. Quando agisce of the judicial authority on the SA is the operational arm of the court "his eyes" so to speak - on the field - and this is done systematically in all cases in which the family of origin is a de facto family. TDM was established by Royal Decree 1404 in 1934 and operates in consigliari rooms consisting of 4 judges, 2 and 2 stipendiary fees, a man and a woman, chosen from "the well-deserving of social assistance." TDM a mandate Social Service and consequently an AS, to conduct the specific activities designed to evaluate a number of aspects of the couple called parenting. This mandate is expressed in the form of the Provisional Decree that can contain no or forms of restriction of parental responsibility : the provisional decree, just because interim, it is not possible to appeal, but it should be noted that the term "provisional" is simply a euphemism because it can remain so for years and years, while Time passes, children grow up, parents grow old and go crazy ..... TdM not exist before the litigation, so there is a confrontation between the parties as TDM listen to parents as a rule, once and from then on determines its decisions solely on the basis of reports submitted by the Social Services. It 'so easy to understand how sensitive these relationships and how great is the "gray zone" in which the parent posto sotto la lente di ingrandimento dal Servizio Sociale, si venga a trovare: il giudice infatti non ha altro elemento di riferimento che queste relazioni che di norma il Servizio Sociale evita di condividere, se non nella forma della restituzione orale, con i diretti interessati, i quali quindi non sanno bene come comportarsi dato che, in primis non sono preparati ad affrontare una condizione simile, secondariamente spesso, non vengono informati, come invece dovrebbe essere per tutti i rapporti con le pubbliche amministrazionidi quelle che sono le procedure ed i loro diritti e che infine, si trovano ad interloquire con un entità che ha, a tutti gli effetti il potere di giudicarli e di togliere loro i figli. Perchè ciò avviene? perchè la "zona gray in a matter of discretion talemente sensitive it is so wide? Formally, it is not so because the AS is not an executioner and answers, like everyone else, the law: the mandate it receives from the court is a specific mandate, often so concise that Nor is there space to locate the discretion within it, the same Order of Social Workers is aware of this so that we are given a code of ethics http://www.ifsw.org/cm_data/italy_codicedeontologico.pdf "> and a series of internal control procedures and disciplinary procedures with a lot of measures ranging from recall, suspension or removal from .... And then, everything ok? Not at all: there is no real form of control than that which may arise from the report of a user, the same user that a few minutes ago I told you that is under the magnifying glass, along with his dearest affections ... AS will not be "evaluated" throughout his career as with other professional materials handling much more insensitive to the life of a child .... something is wrong they have received the same AS and if you go to see on the site http://www.assistentisociali.org will find a link to the page named SOCIAL PROTECTION ASSISTANT PUBLIC IMAGE http://www. assistentisociali.org / petition / as, the page reads " Ever tried to ask someone who does not know our job to describe the role of the social worker? Ideally you will answer that it is the figure who carries away the children when parents argue. ".. Those who have studied a bit of history will recall that Nazi Germany was promoting a huge apparatus pubbliciatario the image of the SS, smiling and surrounded by children, but also remember that there was a war that is the mother and father son of any hoax! No one remembers a site of law enforcement which promotes their public image, yet we are law-enforcement officers who have committed heinous crimes, no one remembers a campaign to promote the image public of the physician, but there are doctors who have made of all colors bouncing from operating the healthy patient to the patient from one hospital to another until it reaches the black woman to end her suffering ... . Never once did the so-called public opinion tutt'erba of a bundle, never once has applied the equation, one mistake = all wrong. Because in each one of these cases the profession expressed by these roles is recognized socially, legally codified and criminally and civilly sanctioned in case of fraud. However .... in the case of social services is not like that and then it is important that everyone knows what happens inside the Local Health Protection of Minors in order to realize how much more can the stark dichotomy between the sensitivity of the matter, the lack of transparency of the assessment stages and the total absence of confrontation between the two sides, characteristic of the proceedings, because they think well what can happen when the Social Services enters the scene. It 'scary as a person's entire life, its culture, its values, its history, his choices, becoming one page of print and that anyone who does not know a thing about all the rest, should decide on the lives that are related to the small page. I'll say it only once: no one here processes the social services, or implementing witch hunts, there is no room for controversy and is not polmica we seek but a search for clarity of roles and locations, the respect for people and the correctness of the choices: a system that works is not hidden inside an archive does not proceed by impressions but relies on codified rules and verifiable, it can stand the comparison and uses objective factors in its action. There is no power without control and the greater the power, more refined should be the instrument of control that it applies when it is not, the form of government is called dictatorship, not democracy. Nemo is listening.
In materia di Tutela Minori, il Servizio Sociale interviene direttamente quando richiesto da un famigliare, dalle istiuzioni scolastiche o su richiesta dell'autorità giudiziaria. Il grado di incisività di questo intervento varia a seconda dei casi, dal monitoraggio, all'allontanamento del o dei minori dal luogo di residenza che dovrebbe limitarsi a casi di "estrema gravità e pregiudizio" ed ove non sia possibile collocare i minori presso parenti. Pare che ad oggi in Italia ci siano 32.000 minori in condizione "di estrema gravità e pregiduzio": 32.000 minori allontanati dalle famiglie e collocati presso strutture eterofamigliari con un costo annuo di circa € 72.000,00 a bambino per un totale di € 2.304.000.000,00 ( tanto per dare una dimensione a questa cifra possiamo dire che Il PIL del Togo del 2008 era di € 2.369.800.000,00 ) - fonte Panorama 17.11.2009 - Sequestri di Stato -. Quando agisce of the judicial authority on the SA is the operational arm of the court "his eyes" so to speak - on the field - and this is done systematically in all cases in which the family of origin is a de facto family. TDM was established by Royal Decree 1404 in 1934 and operates in consigliari rooms consisting of 4 judges, 2 and 2 stipendiary fees, a man and a woman, chosen from "the well-deserving of social assistance." TDM a mandate Social Service and consequently an AS, to conduct the specific activities designed to evaluate a number of aspects of the couple called parenting. This mandate is expressed in the form of the Provisional Decree that can contain no or forms of restriction of parental responsibility : the provisional decree, just because interim, it is not possible to appeal, but it should be noted that the term "provisional" is simply a euphemism because it can remain so for years and years, while Time passes, children grow up, parents grow old and go crazy ..... TdM not exist before the litigation, so there is a confrontation between the parties as TDM listen to parents as a rule, once and from then on determines its decisions solely on the basis of reports submitted by the Social Services. It 'so easy to understand how sensitive these relationships and how great is the "gray zone" in which the parent posto sotto la lente di ingrandimento dal Servizio Sociale, si venga a trovare: il giudice infatti non ha altro elemento di riferimento che queste relazioni che di norma il Servizio Sociale evita di condividere, se non nella forma della restituzione orale, con i diretti interessati, i quali quindi non sanno bene come comportarsi dato che, in primis non sono preparati ad affrontare una condizione simile, secondariamente spesso, non vengono informati, come invece dovrebbe essere per tutti i rapporti con le pubbliche amministrazionidi quelle che sono le procedure ed i loro diritti e che infine, si trovano ad interloquire con un entità che ha, a tutti gli effetti il potere di giudicarli e di togliere loro i figli. Perchè ciò avviene? perchè la "zona gray in a matter of discretion talemente sensitive it is so wide? Formally, it is not so because the AS is not an executioner and answers, like everyone else, the law: the mandate it receives from the court is a specific mandate, often so concise that Nor is there space to locate the discretion within it, the same Order of Social Workers is aware of this so that we are given a code of ethics http://www.ifsw.org/cm_data/italy_codicedeontologico.pdf "> and a series of internal control procedures and disciplinary procedures with a lot of measures ranging from recall, suspension or removal from .... And then, everything ok? Not at all: there is no real form of control than that which may arise from the report of a user, the same user that a few minutes ago I told you that is under the magnifying glass, along with his dearest affections ... AS will not be "evaluated" throughout his career as with other professional materials handling much more insensitive to the life of a child .... something is wrong they have received the same AS and if you go to see on the site http://www.assistentisociali.org will find a link to the page named SOCIAL PROTECTION ASSISTANT PUBLIC IMAGE http://www. assistentisociali.org / petition / as, the page reads " Ever tried to ask someone who does not know our job to describe the role of the social worker? Ideally you will answer that it is the figure who carries away the children when parents argue. ".. Those who have studied a bit of history will recall that Nazi Germany was promoting a huge apparatus pubbliciatario the image of the SS, smiling and surrounded by children, but also remember that there was a war that is the mother and father son of any hoax! No one remembers a site of law enforcement which promotes their public image, yet we are law-enforcement officers who have committed heinous crimes, no one remembers a campaign to promote the image public of the physician, but there are doctors who have made of all colors bouncing from operating the healthy patient to the patient from one hospital to another until it reaches the black woman to end her suffering ... . Never once did the so-called public opinion tutt'erba of a bundle, never once has applied the equation, one mistake = all wrong. Because in each one of these cases the profession expressed by these roles is recognized socially, legally codified and criminally and civilly sanctioned in case of fraud. However .... in the case of social services is not like that and then it is important that everyone knows what happens inside the Local Health Protection of Minors in order to realize how much more can the stark dichotomy between the sensitivity of the matter, the lack of transparency of the assessment stages and the total absence of confrontation between the two sides, characteristic of the proceedings, because they think well what can happen when the Social Services enters the scene. It 'scary as a person's entire life, its culture, its values, its history, his choices, becoming one page of print and that anyone who does not know a thing about all the rest, should decide on the lives that are related to the small page. I'll say it only once: no one here processes the social services, or implementing witch hunts, there is no room for controversy and is not polmica we seek but a search for clarity of roles and locations, the respect for people and the correctness of the choices: a system that works is not hidden inside an archive does not proceed by impressions but relies on codified rules and verifiable, it can stand the comparison and uses objective factors in its action. There is no power without control and the greater the power, more refined should be the instrument of control that it applies when it is not, the form of government is called dictatorship, not democracy. Nemo is listening.
0 comments:
Post a Comment