Pink Spots Day Before Period... Is This Normal

Privacy: Obsession or Necessity?

Privacy! Meta-juridical and legal phenomenon varied and complex in recent years has been the terror of professionals (terror more than understandable given the extent of sanctions to be imposed and the amount of cards, however, has resulted), the object of curiosity for the media, attracted perhaps by the designation Anglophone and now, even on the political agenda - see the story "online publication of tax returns" and "journalistic publication of wiretapping."

in a society where personal data can be collected, processed, handled, transported anywhere and at no time should not be surprising that there is a strong focus on privacy, or the right to privacy.

Quite simply, I would observe that the new technologies, have laid bare the King: that is, any behavior, speech, image can be easily and quickly available to an indefinite public. Which may, of course, dispose of as they wish.

La distribuzione di massa applicata al voyeurismo.

Qui nasce il problema politico. E quello sociale.

Il problema giuridico, posto che mi pare evidente il diritto soggettivo alla tutela della propria riservatezza ed a poter disporre dei propri dati personali (visto anche il loro valore patrimoniale!) si pone quindi in relazione alla tutela concreta. Come bloccare la diffusione di dati personali sul web? O la loro raccolta ed il loro indiscriminato trattamento? Si tratta di problemi concreti con cui si è scontrato chi si è trovato a difendere vittime di molestie, diffamazioni, lesioni della riservetezza, in rete...purtroppo constatando una certa difficoltà di intervento.

Pertanto, tornando al titolo, la privacy - or rather, the tutelle of - I feel an irrepressible need today and not a fleeting phenomenon of fashion, or worse, an obsession to some. Analyzed the problems, it is time to look at strategies for contrast.

How Much Are Pokemon Coins

Consumer Protection and aggressive commercial practices

The Consumer Code is an advanced tool for consumer protection law, however, seems to me - even after a long time since its publication - yet little known and popular among the "tools of the trade" of lawyers. And unfortunately there are few consumers who are aware of their rights and who can afford a legal tug of war "to affirm them in practice.

thus indicating that the artt.24-25-26 of the Consumer Code describes analytically some of the professional misconduct (or one acting in the course of his business or profession, or through an intermediary), defined as "aggressive commercial practices" aimed at inducing the consumer to take a transactional decision that would otherwise have taken . In particular I would highlight the following behaviors, which often are reported to the Consumer Associations, which are forbidden by law: " b) carry out visits to the consumer's home, ignoring the calls of the consumer to leave his residence or not to return except 'in the circumstances and to the extent that they are justified under national law to enforce a contractual obligation; "but, above all:" c) make repeated and unwanted solicitations by telephone, fax, e-mail or other means of distance communication, except 'in the circumstances and to the extent they are justified under national law, to enforce a contractual obligation, without prejudice to Article 58 and Article 130 of Legislative Decree 30 June 2003, No 196. "

In the latter case, although it is an issue of coordination of consumer law with that of privacy (which, depending on the interpretative reading of the text, could lead to an emptying of meaning of paragraph c, which would become little more than a duplication of part of the law on privacy), in particular, could be extended by interpretation and, of course, only in civil law, the specter of unlawful conduct spam - this is, after all - pointing out that even if a behavior is not disruptive of confidentiality, it is still detectable as "aggressive" and unfair to the consumer.